Skip to Content

There has been controversy surrounding the use of aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) in firefighting due to the toxic effects of the chemicals used in their manufacture. AFFFs contain perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), which are part of a group of highly resistant substances known as “forever chemicals”. These chemicals can remain in the environment and the human body for long periods, causing various diseases and types of cancer.

The increasing number of lawsuits against 3M and DuPont highlights the grave danger of AFFFs, and the harm they can cause to firefighters and individuals exposed to the chemicals. These lawsuits allege that the manufacturers knew about the toxic effects of PFOA and PFOS, yet continued to produce AFFFs. The consolidated lawsuits, known as the fire foam lawsuit or firefighting foam lawsuit, seek compensation for damages caused by exposure to AFFFs.

One specific lawsuit related to AFFFs is the AFFF Firefighter Foam Cancer Lawsuit. This lawsuit seeks justice for firefighters who have developed cancer as a result of exposure to AFFFs. The lawsuit alleges that firefighting foam manufacturers knew about the dangers of PFOA and PFOS, but continued to sell and promote the product. This has led to a growing awareness of the need for greater regulation of the use of firefighting foams containing these chemicals, as well as greater protection for firefighters and the general public.

Other lawsuits related to AFFFs include the fire fighting foam lawsuit, firefighter foam lawsuit, and firefighter foam cancer lawsuit. These lawsuits seek compensation for individuals who have been exposed to AFFFs and have suffered harm as a result. The fire retardant foam lawsuit is another type of lawsuit related to AFFFs, seeking compensation for individuals exposed to fire retardant foam containing harmful chemicals.
One of the most significant lawsuits related to AFFFs is the 3M fire fighting foam lawsuit. This lawsuit alleges that 3M knew about the toxic effects of PFOA and PFOS but continued to produce and sell AFFFs containing these chemicals. The lawsuit seeks compensation for individuals who have been exposed to 3M’s AFFFs and have suffered harm as a result.

The growing number of lawsuits related to firefighting foam and AFFFs has led to updates on the status of the lawsuits. The firefighting foam lawsuit, firefighters foam lawsuit, and afff foam lawsuit are all ongoing, with no settlements reached yet. However, individuals affected by AFFFs can seek justice through the afff lawsuit settlement amounts, which offer compensation for harm caused by exposure to AFFFs.
In summary, the dangers of AFFFs have led to a growing number of lawsuits seeking justice for individuals who have suffered harm as a result of exposure to these chemicals. It is important for individuals affected by these chemicals to seek justice and compensation for the harm they have suffered.

Get Legal Assistance If you are a firefighter who served prior to 2003 and was exposed to AFFFs and suffers from any of the symptoms listed above, you may be entitled to compensation. Our team at Oppenheim Law recognizes the emotional burden these conditions and cancers can have on individuals and their lives. Please contact us at (954) 384-6114 to learn about your legal rights and how you can receive the compensation you deserve.